Runtime semantics of p:try

• From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
• Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:26:55 -0400
• To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC7870A6DC3BA@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>

An XProc user pointed out to me that the following sentence (Section 2.1, Steps) is not entirely correct for p:try:

"The runtime semantics of a multi-container step are that it behaves as if it evaluated exactly one of its subpipelines. In this sense, they function like compound steps."

Clearly, p:try may evaluate (parts of) both sub-pipelines.

Regards,
Vojtech

Received on Friday, 25 September 2009 16:03:06 UTC