- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:16:45 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m23a6unauq.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes: > Section 5.7.4 (p:with-param) demands that the names of parameters must > not be in the XProc namespace. Does anyone know why? I can understand > this requirement for p:option and p:variable, but why is this required > also for parameters? > > The problem with this is that except for p:with-param, the names of > parameters cannot be checked statically: the user can pass parameters in > any namespace to the pipeline with no problems. Also, when binding a > parameter input port to a c:param-set documents, you have no control > over the parameter names. > > We should either add a dynamic error for parameter names in the XProc > namespace, or drop this requirement. Fixed, per the minutes of the 6 Aug telcon. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As we grow older we grow both more http://nwalsh.com/ | foolish and wiser at the same time.--La | Rochefoucauld
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:17:26 UTC