- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:56:32 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> Hi Henry,
>
> Do you really expect this test
>
> http://tests.xproc.org/tests/required/import-006.xml
>
> to succeed?
Yes, absolutely.
> Our spec says:
>
> If a pipeline or library author uses two different URI values that
> resolve to the same resource, they must not be considered the same
> imported library.
Whoa! That contradicts
In the absence of additional information outside the scope of this
specification within the resource, the base URI of the library is
always the URI of the actual resource returned. In other words, it
is the URI of the resource retrieved after all redirection has
occurred.
plus
If the actual base URI is the same as one that has already been
processed, the implementation must recognize it as the same library
and should not need to process the resource.
!
Indeed the whole paragraph from which _your_ quote is drawn appears to
me to be self-contradictory:
A library is considered the same library if the URI of the resource
retrieved is the same. If a pipeline or library author uses two
different URI values that resolve to the same resource, they must
not be considered the same imported library.
I think that 'not' is just wrong!
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFK3xMQkjnJixAXWBoRAvclAJ90FKgWcQlyd7+lVJSdtdaRwq0D2wCcCw04
AjYPiAmlZUojEmGMn2KE2Ys=
=YDJx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 13:57:04 UTC