- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:56:32 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Norman Walsh writes: > Hi Henry, > > Do you really expect this test > > http://tests.xproc.org/tests/required/import-006.xml > > to succeed? Yes, absolutely. > Our spec says: > > If a pipeline or library author uses two different URI values that > resolve to the same resource, they must not be considered the same > imported library. Whoa! That contradicts In the absence of additional information outside the scope of this specification within the resource, the base URI of the library is always the URI of the actual resource returned. In other words, it is the URI of the resource retrieved after all redirection has occurred. plus If the actual base URI is the same as one that has already been processed, the implementation must recognize it as the same library and should not need to process the resource. ! Indeed the whole paragraph from which _your_ quote is drawn appears to me to be self-contradictory: A library is considered the same library if the URI of the resource retrieved is the same. If a pipeline or library author uses two different URI values that resolve to the same resource, they must not be considered the same imported library. I think that 'not' is just wrong! ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFK3xMQkjnJixAXWBoRAvclAJ90FKgWcQlyd7+lVJSdtdaRwq0D2wCcCw04 AjYPiAmlZUojEmGMn2KE2Ys= =YDJx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 13:57:04 UTC