Re: Another take on versioning

Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> writes:

> Yes, my proposal is an explicit attempt to remove the <p:import>  
> requirement. If you want to keep it, my ask is that somehow it's made  
> clear what happens when you have a pipeline A that imports the XProc  
> 2.0 library and a library B that imports the XProc 1.0 library. And  
> that what happens is not that there's an error.

Today, that's an error. I don't see anyway to make that *not* be an
error since it amounts to having two different declarations for the
same step type.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Always and never are two words that you
http://nwalsh.com/            | should always remember never to
                              | use.--Wendell Johnson