- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:00:39 +0200
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
2009/10/12 Jeni Tennison wrote: > On 12 Oct 2009, at 08:48, <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> wrote: >> But the dependency between the two steps must still be preserved. Simply >> replacing the p:pipe binding would break the dependency graph. > I don't really understand why this is important, given that if there's no > data passing between them then there is no dependency between them. But XProc is not functional, so the data actually flowing between steps is not enough to infer the dependency graph, I guess, cause steps can have side effects too. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 09:01:14 UTC