- From: David A. Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:47:10 -0400
- To: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- CC: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 12:47:49 UTC
Cant the absence of the version attribute be implied to mean "1.0" ? That way any existing pipeline is implicitly "1.0" Making something required that wasnt at this stage of the game will break existing pipelines. David A. Lee dlee@calldei.com http://www.calldei.com http://www.xmlsh.org 812-482-5224 Florent Georges wrote: > 2009/10/8 Norman Walsh wrote: > > Hi, > > >> I wonder if this would be better. >> > > I think introducing the version attribute is a good thing. But why > don't making it required? If a further version wants to introduce > slight differences for the same components (I know that can sound > weird, but think about XSLT 1.0 vs. 2.0), that won't be possible if we > have a lot of legacy pipelines without explicit version. > > But if we know that existing pipelines have version="1.0" we will be > less limited. For instance if XProc 2.0 wants, hum, let's say, just > by chance, to use XDM ;-) > > Regards, > >
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 12:47:49 UTC