- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:55:06 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:55:40 UTC
"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes:
> In the example above, p:xpath-context *appears* in p:when, but *has no
> binding*. In our current implementation, this will result in a binding
> to the current default readable port (result of "identity" in this
> case). Is this the correct/expected behavior?
Per the minutes of 10 Sep, it is an error to leave the p:xpath-context
element empty. If you use it, you must specify a binding explicitly.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Noble patterns must be fetched here and
http://nwalsh.com/ | there from single persons, rather than
| whole nations, and from all nations,
| rather than any one.--Sir Thomas Browne
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:55:40 UTC