- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:55:06 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:55:40 UTC
"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes: > In the example above, p:xpath-context *appears* in p:when, but *has no > binding*. In our current implementation, this will result in a binding > to the current default readable port (result of "identity" in this > case). Is this the correct/expected behavior? Per the minutes of 10 Sep, it is an error to leave the p:xpath-context element empty. If you use it, you must specify a binding explicitly. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Noble patterns must be fetched here and http://nwalsh.com/ | there from single persons, rather than | whole nations, and from all nations, | rather than any one.--Sir Thomas Browne
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:55:40 UTC