RE: err:XD0002 vs. err:XD0011 vs. err:XD0029 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 2009-07-28 (public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org from July 2009)

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:23:15 -0400
To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC7871055E58D@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>

> I don't think its as simple as removing err:XD0002, there could be
> some rationalization across all three but I don't have spare cycles to
> suggest how.

I had the same feeling (err:XD0002 is not really a subset of err:XD0011
and err:XD0029 in the strictest sense), but I am just not sure whether
we want to go into such a level of detail in the spec. I don't think the
spec does that for other errors (XPath-related errors come to mind).

Regards,
Vojtech

Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 10:24:21 UTC