- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:08:06 +0100
- To: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [anon] writes: > But now I wonder... Section 2.3 says: > > "If a step has a single output port and that port is explicitly marked > "primary='false'", or if a step has more than one output port and none > is explicitly marked as the primary, then the primary output port of > that step is undefined." > > So is it right that the following: > > <p:declare-step> > <p:input port="one"/> > <p:input port="two" primary="true"/> > </p:declare-step> > > results in both "one" and "two" being non-primary? Presuming you meant those to be output ports, so we have <p:declare-step> <p:output port="one"/> <p:output port="two" primary="true"/> </p:declare-step> "... a step has more than one output port and _none is explicitly marked_ as the primary," [emphasis added] I don't see how the above words apply to this case -- *two* _is_ explicitly marked as primary. Or am I missing something? ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFKaDaJkjnJixAXWBoRAlsaAJ0V3KjEXT/UOHMGpvyPX2fcd+2bAwCfbjOf uQZ+YCUe6YMN01hNnJ2cwNM= =4BSL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 10:08:49 UTC