- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:10:37 -0500
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
> If I understand correctly the following sentence (from the current > CR at http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/#cv.multipart, in 7.1.10.2 Request > Entity body conversion): > > Each multipart body is represented by a c:body preceded by some > number of c:header elements. These preceding headers associated > with the body part in the multipart message. > > it corresponds to the content model: > > <c:multipart > content-type? = string > boundary = string> > (c:header*, > c:body)+ > </c:multipart> > > but is defined as (note the missing parens): > > <c:multipart > content-type? = string > boundary = string> > c:header*, > c:body+ > </c:multipart> > > Have I missed something? > I ran into the very same problem today while implementing the multipart support in our XProc processor. I think the content model should indeed be (c:header*, c:body)+ Also, the sentence: "These preceding headers associated with the body part in the multipart message" should probably read: "These preceding headers ARE associated with the body part in the multipart message." Regards, Vojtech
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 13:12:10 UTC