- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:27:52 +0100
- To: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
2009/1/14 ? wrote: > Hmm, interesting point... One possible advantage of having the boundary > information in the response could be that it makes it possible to > "re-post" the response data to the server as-is: you just replace the > c:response wrapper with c:request and pass it to p:http-request, without > being forced to set the boundary information in c:multipart. Yes, I didn't think about that case. > But I guess that the real question is: Does/can having the boundary > information in the response cause any issues? Maybe not. But having it required could maybe be an issue for an implementation, I am not sure the existing APIs for HTTP do provide this info. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 13:28:31 UTC