public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org from January 2009 by date

Thursday, 29 January 2009

• [closed] Re: 2.13, flawed? Norman Walsh
• Re: p:hash and xml:base Norman Walsh
• Re: p:hash and xml:base Norman Walsh
• Re: p:hash and xml:base Florent Georges
• RE: p:hash and xml:base Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• Re: p:hash and xml:base Florent Georges
• RE: [closed] Re: Scoping of step types Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• p:hash and xml:base Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

Wednesday, 28 January 2009

• [closed] Re: Scoping of step types Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: err:XS0036 clarification Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: Preserving base URI Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: Exclude-inline-prefixes and unused prefixes Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: exclude-inline-prefixes (err:XS0057, err:XS0058) Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: Annoyances with parameter input ports Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: Do we need err:XS0016? Norman Walsh

Monday, 26 January 2009

• Re: p:http-request - conflicting content-type information for body parts Florent Georges
• RE: p:http-request - conflicting content-type information for body parts Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• Re: p:http-request - conflicting content-type information for body parts Florent Georges
• p:http-request - conflicting content-type information for body parts Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

Friday, 23 January 2009

• RE: http-request - Request entity body conversion and the 'encoding' attribute Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• p:http-request - Request entity body conversion and the 'encoding' attribute Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• RE: Typo in content model of c:multipart? Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• Re: Ordering of steps in a subpipeline Henry S. Thompson

Thursday, 22 January 2009

• RE: Ordering of steps in a subpipeline Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• Re: Ordering of steps in a subpipeline Henry S. Thompson
• [closed] Re: Objection to XProc: An XML Pipeline Language section(s) 5.7.3, 5.7.4 Norman Walsh
• Ordering of steps in a subpipeline Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• err:XS0010 and err:XS0031 Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

Tuesday, 20 January 2009

• Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources David A. Lee
• Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

Monday, 19 January 2009

• http-request: if detail is true, XML not parsed? Florent Georges
• Error in the XProc Relax NG schema? Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

Sunday, 18 January 2009

• c:request/@send-authorization default Florent Georges
• Typo in content model of c:multipart? Florent Georges

Friday, 16 January 2009

• p:unescape-markup - changing the namespace URI Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

Wednesday, 14 January 2009

• RE: multipart/@boundary Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• Re: multipart/@boundary Florent Georges
• RE: multipart/@boundary Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• Re: Preserving base URI Henry S. Thompson
• c:multipart/@boundary Florent Georges

Tuesday, 13 January 2009

• Re: HTTP "related protocols?" Florent Georges
• Required serialization methods support Florent Georges
• RE: HTTP "related protocols?" Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
• HTTP "related protocols?" Florent Georges
• Typo: c:http-request and c:http-response Florent Georges

Monday, 12 January 2009

• Select expression in input declaration Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

Thursday, 8 January 2009

• 7.1.7 typo James Sulak
• Re: Objection to XProc: An XML Pipeline Language section(s) 5.7.3, 5.7.4 David A. Lee

Wednesday, 7 January 2009

• Re: Objection to XProc: An XML Pipeline Language section(s) 5.7.3, 5.7.4 Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: Extension steps and declarations Norman Walsh
• Re: err:XC0016 and err:XD0019 Norman Walsh

Last message date: Thursday, 29 January 2009 19:25:35 UTC