[closed] Re: sub-pipeline

"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:

> The term is used twice in the CR, first in 2.5
>
> Nowhere is there a definition.

Thanks. That was a typo for 'subpipeline'.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | You look wise. Pray correct that
http://nwalsh.com/            | error.--Charles Lamb