- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:54:36 +0100
- To: Vasil Rangelov <boen.robot@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
2009/12/18 Vasil Rangelov wrote: > Though to be honest, if all enumerated option values were QNames, it would > be nice indeed. The more extensibility hooks, the better ^_^ . I think XSLT had a clever approach to that, for instance for xsl:output's @method. It can be any QName except an NCName, which are reserved for the recommendation itself. So standard values are simple, they look like simple strings, without any namespace stuff overhead ("text", "xml", etc.) while an implementation can provide more values in a clean way: by using a namespace-based mechanism. -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Received on Friday, 18 December 2009 18:56:04 UTC