- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:15:06 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2mya0wsph.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes: > I have a question about reporting err:C0001 (unsupported serialization > method) and err:XD0020 (invalid combination of serialization > parameters). > > The test suite contains a test (err-c0001-001.xml) that does the > following: > > <p:pipeline> <p:serialization port="result" method="nonexistant"/> > <p:identity/> </p:pipeline> > > The test is expected to fail with err:XC0001. > > The spec says the following about p:serialization (section 5.6): > > "If the pipeline processor serializes the output on the specified > port, it must use the serialization options specified. If the > processor is not serializing (if, for example, the pipeline has been > called from another pipeline), then the p:serialization must be > ignored. The processor may reject statically a pipeline that requests > serialization options that it cannot provide." > > Our implementation does not serialize - except when you use the > command-line interface, in which case we of course apply the provided > serialization options to the output ports. > > Because both err:XC0001 and err:XD0020 are dynamic errors, we don't > reject invalid/unsupported p:serializations statically. Only when the > processors tries to use them, we report an error. > > My question is: > > - Is the test correct? > - Or: does the test suite assume, for the purpose of easy testing of > serialization options, that serialization options are always applied > to the top-level pipeline (as if it was ran from the command-line)? > - Or: are we doing something wrong in our implementation? Or, maybe this is just an area where the spec isn't clear. I think my implementation checks the serialization options when it encounters the p:serialization element, whether or not the results are ever serialized. I don't think we currently say whether that is required or even allowed. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A man who is 'of sound mind' is one who http://nwalsh.com/ | keeps the inner madman under lock and | key.--Paul Valéry
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 18:15:52 UTC