- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:05:29 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2eivcy7py.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes: > I've seen the last editor draft has added a few words about > redirects for http-request: > > 7.1.10.3.1 Redirects > > The p:http-request step must follow redirect requests (3xx > status codes) if they are returned by the server. > > But from the top of my head, I think the HTTP spec carefully > use MUST, SHOULD, MUST NOT, etc. to qualify whether a client > should follow or not a redirect. I think for instance that a > client cannot follow a redirect in response to a POST or a PUT, > if I am right. > > Clearly, having a uniform redirect-following policy on every > implementations would be nice, but I wonder if the above sentence > is really helpful for that purpose. I've updated that section, changing the requirement to a SHOULD and making explicit reference to HTTP semantics. Please let me know if you are unhappy with this resolution. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Don't despair, not even over the fact http://nwalsh.com/ | that you don't despair.-- Kafka
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 18:06:11 UTC