- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:05:29 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2eivcy7py.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes:
> I've seen the last editor draft has added a few words about
> redirects for http-request:
>
> 7.1.10.3.1 Redirects
>
> The p:http-request step must follow redirect requests (3xx
> status codes) if they are returned by the server.
>
> But from the top of my head, I think the HTTP spec carefully
> use MUST, SHOULD, MUST NOT, etc. to qualify whether a client
> should follow or not a redirect. I think for instance that a
> client cannot follow a redirect in response to a POST or a PUT,
> if I am right.
>
> Clearly, having a uniform redirect-following policy on every
> implementations would be nice, but I wonder if the above sentence
> is really helpful for that purpose.
I've updated that section, changing the requirement to a SHOULD and
making explicit reference to HTTP semantics. Please let me know if you
are unhappy with this resolution.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Don't despair, not even over the fact
http://nwalsh.com/ | that you don't despair.-- Kafka
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 18:06:11 UTC