[closed] Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare

James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> writes:

> +1 from me
>
> J
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
>> James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> writes:
>>> wondering if p:compare p:output should really be non-primary ... from
>>> a DWIM pov I think that we will want to 80% of the time use a result
>>
>> The WG considered this question on the 23 Apr 2009 telcon and decided not
>> to make this change. Please let us know if you are unsatisfied by this
>> resolution.
>>
>>                                        Be seeing you,
>>                                          norm
>>
>> --
>> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I often marvel that while each man
>> http://nwalsh.com/            | loves himself more than anyone else, he
>>                              | sets less value on his own estimate
>>                              | than on the opinions of others.--Marcus
>>                              | Aurelius
>>

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Those who in their youth did not live
http://nwalsh.com/            | in self-harmony, and who did not gain
                              | the true treasures of life, are later
                              | like long-legged old herons standing
                              | sadly by a lake without fish.--The
                              | Dhammapada