- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:59:57 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 16:00:40 UTC
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
> Note
>
> User-defined pipelines (identified with pfx:user-pipeline in the
> preceding syntax summary) are atomic. A pipeline declaration may
> contain a subpipeline, but the invocation of that pipeline does not.
>
> Does not what?
>
> Does not contain a pipeline? Can an invocation contain anything?
>
> Clarification please
Fixed, I believe:
User-defined pipelines (identified with pfx:user-pipeline in the
preceding syntax summary) are atomic. A pipeline declaration may
contain a subpipeline, but the invocation of that pipeline is atomic
and does not contain a subpipeline.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To create a little flower is the labour
http://nwalsh.com/ | of ages.-- Blake
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 16:00:40 UTC