- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:59:57 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 16:00:40 UTC
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes: > Note > > User-defined pipelines (identified with pfx:user-pipeline in the > preceding syntax summary) are atomic. A pipeline declaration may > contain a subpipeline, but the invocation of that pipeline does not. > > Does not what? > > Does not contain a pipeline? Can an invocation contain anything? > > Clarification please Fixed, I believe: User-defined pipelines (identified with pfx:user-pipeline in the preceding syntax summary) are atomic. A pipeline declaration may contain a subpipeline, but the invocation of that pipeline is atomic and does not contain a subpipeline. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To create a little flower is the labour http://nwalsh.com/ | of ages.-- Blake
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 16:00:40 UTC