Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare

James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> writes:
> wondering if p:compare p:output should really be non-primary ... from
> a DWIM pov I think that we will want to 80% of the time use a result
>
> thx for considering, Jim Fuller

I can't immediately lay my hands on the minutes where we made this
decision. In retrospect it looks like a pretty arbitrary choice to me,
with my current intuition leaning in Jim's direction.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Through space the universe grasps me
http://nwalsh.com/            | and swallows me up like a speck;
                              | through thought I grasp it.-- Pascal