Tuesday, 28 April 2009
- [closed] Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?
 - Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?
 - Re: Rejecting invalid/unsupported p:serialization
 - [closed] Re: Relative URIs in p:log
 - Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?
 - [closed] Re: @href: HTTP request body as an external file
 - Re: p:exec - quote characters
 - Re: p:validate-with-xml-schema - multiple schemas provided
 
Monday, 27 April 2009
- RE: [closed] Re: p:exec - path separators
 - Re: [closed] Re: p:exec - path separators
 - Re: Default namespaces in XPath
 - Re: Default namespaces in XPath
 - Re: Default namespaces in XPath
 - Re: Default namespaces in XPath
 - RE: [closed] Re: p:exec - path separators
 - Default namespaces in XPath
 - Rejecting invalid/unsupported p:serialization
 
Saturday, 25 April 2009
Friday, 24 April 2009
Thursday, 23 April 2009
- Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare
 - Re: @href: HTTP request body as an external file
 - [closed] Re: p:exec - path separators
 
Wednesday, 22 April 2009
- [closed] Re: c:request/@send-authorization default
 - [closed] Re: isnt p:group just p:declare-step
 - [closed] Re: p:group on p:try a bit verbose
 - [closed] Re: errors and exceptions in xproc
 - Re: c:request/@send-authorization default
 - Re: c:request/@send-authorization default
 - Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare
 
Tuesday, 21 April 2009
- Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
 - Re: Relative URIs in p:log
 - Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
 - RE: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
 - RE: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
 - Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
 - Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
 - Re: Relative URIs in p:log
 - RE: Relative URIs in p:log
 
Monday, 20 April 2009
- Re: XQuery 1.0
 - Re: Relative URIs in p:log
 - Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
 - Re: choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
 
Thursday, 16 April 2009
- Re: Test http-request-012: p:http-request and 302 HTTP redirect
 - [closed] Re: p:http-request: required cookie support?
 - Re: Test http-request-012: p:http-request and 302 HTTP redirect
 - Re: Test http-request-012: p:http-request and 302 HTTP redirect
 - Re: p:http-request: required cookie support?
 - [closed] Re: p:validate-with-xml-schema question
 - Re: Test http-request-012: p:http-request and 302 HTTP redirect
 - Re: p:http-request: required cookie support?
 - [closed] Re: p:http-request - conflicting content-type information for body parts
 - [closed] Re: err:XS0010 and err:XS0031
 
Tuesday, 14 April 2009
- [closed] Re: p:www-form-urldecode - decoding of parameter names and values
 - Re: p:exec - path separators
 - RE: err:XS0010 and err:XS0031
 - RE: p:exec - path separators
 - RE: [closed] Re: 5.4 p:output. Informative para request
 
Friday, 10 April 2009
- Re: p:exec - path separators
 - Re: err:XS0010 and err:XS0031
 - Re: c:request/@send-authorization default
 - [closed] Re: Error in the XProc Relax NG schema?
 - [closed] Re: 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 variables, options, parameters
 - Re: 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 variables, options, parameters
 - Re: [closed] Re: Editorial. Section 2 note
 - Re: [closed] Re: 5.4 p:output. Informative para request
 - Re: 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 variables, options, parameters
 - [closed] Re: Editorial. Section 2 note
 - [closed] Re: 2.6 Clarification
 - [closed] Re: 5.4 p:output. Informative para request
 - RE: [closed] Re: Test err-c0016-001.xml and xs:boolean
 - RE: xquery and c:data
 
Thursday, 9 April 2009
- Re: [closed] Re: Test err-c0016-001.xml and xs:boolean
 - [closed] Re: p:exec - multiple source documents
 - [closed] Re: p:xquery and c:data
 - Re: p:exec - path separators
 - Re: xquery and c:data
 - Re: p:xquery and c:data
 - [closed] Re: Section 5.11 unnecessary complex?
 - [closed] Re: Inherited environment and input/output ports
 - [closed] Re: p:xquery - empty context item
 - Re: p:validate-with-xml-schema question
 - RE: [closed] Re: Test err-c0016-001.xml and xs:boolean
 - Re: [closed] Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources
 - [closed] Re: http-request: if detail is true, XML not parsed?
 
Wednesday, 8 April 2009
- [closed] Re: Test err-c0016-001.xml and xs:boolean
 - [closed] Re: p:http-request: c:response/c:body/@content-type value
 - [closed] Re: p:http-request content-type and encoding
 - [closed] Re: p:http-request: status message
 - [closed] Re: p:http-request - duplication of information in c:multipart
 - Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?
 - RE: [closed] Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources
 - Re: XQuery 1.0
 - HTTP redirects: MUST follow?
 - Re: http-request: if detail is true, XML not parsed?
 - Re: [closed] Re: Required serialization methods support
 
Tuesday, 7 April 2009
- [closed] Re: p:hash and xml:base
 - [closed] Re: Ordering of steps in a subpipeline
 - [closed] Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources
 - Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources
 - Re: http-request: if detail is true, XML not parsed?
 - [closed] Re: Required serialization methods support
 - Re: XQuery 1.0
 - [closed] Re: err:XC0016 and err:XD0019
 - [closed] Re: New http-request test, http-request-012.xml
 - [closed] Re: p:unescape-markup - "namespace" confusion
 - [closed] Re: Select expression in input declaration
 - [closed] Re: p:unescape-markup - changing the namespace URI
 - [closed] Re: Replacing the document node in p:string-replace
 - [closed] Re: p:xquery and XQueries that cannot be evaluated
 - XQuery 1.0
 - [closed] Re: Explain "&" in the syntax tableaux
 - [closed] Re: Return code from p:exec?
 - [closed] Re: Our algorithm for anonymous step names doesn't work
 - [closed] Re: http-request authentication missing realm?
 
Thursday, 2 April 2009
- Relative URIs in p:log
 - Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
 - Re: isnt p:group just p:declare-step
 - RE: choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
 - Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare
 - Re: isnt p:group just p:declare-step
 - Re: p:group on p:try a bit verbose
 - Re: errors and exceptions in xproc
 - Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare
 - Re: isnt p:group just p:declare-step
 - p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified