Tuesday, 28 April 2009
- [closed] Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?
- Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?
- Re: Rejecting invalid/unsupported p:serialization
- [closed] Re: Relative URIs in p:log
- Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?
- [closed] Re: @href: HTTP request body as an external file
- Re: p:exec - quote characters
- Re: p:validate-with-xml-schema - multiple schemas provided
Monday, 27 April 2009
- RE: [closed] Re: p:exec - path separators
- Re: [closed] Re: p:exec - path separators
- Re: Default namespaces in XPath
- Re: Default namespaces in XPath
- Re: Default namespaces in XPath
- Re: Default namespaces in XPath
- RE: [closed] Re: p:exec - path separators
- Default namespaces in XPath
- Rejecting invalid/unsupported p:serialization
Saturday, 25 April 2009
Friday, 24 April 2009
Thursday, 23 April 2009
- Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare
- Re: @href: HTTP request body as an external file
- [closed] Re: p:exec - path separators
Wednesday, 22 April 2009
- [closed] Re: c:request/@send-authorization default
- [closed] Re: isnt p:group just p:declare-step
- [closed] Re: p:group on p:try a bit verbose
- [closed] Re: errors and exceptions in xproc
- Re: c:request/@send-authorization default
- Re: c:request/@send-authorization default
- Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare
Tuesday, 21 April 2009
- Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
- Re: Relative URIs in p:log
- Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
- RE: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
- RE: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
- Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
- Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
- Re: Relative URIs in p:log
- RE: Relative URIs in p:log
Monday, 20 April 2009
- Re: XQuery 1.0
- Re: Relative URIs in p:log
- Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
- Re: choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
Thursday, 16 April 2009
- Re: Test http-request-012: p:http-request and 302 HTTP redirect
- [closed] Re: p:http-request: required cookie support?
- Re: Test http-request-012: p:http-request and 302 HTTP redirect
- Re: Test http-request-012: p:http-request and 302 HTTP redirect
- Re: p:http-request: required cookie support?
- [closed] Re: p:validate-with-xml-schema question
- Re: Test http-request-012: p:http-request and 302 HTTP redirect
- Re: p:http-request: required cookie support?
- [closed] Re: p:http-request - conflicting content-type information for body parts
- [closed] Re: err:XS0010 and err:XS0031
Tuesday, 14 April 2009
- [closed] Re: p:www-form-urldecode - decoding of parameter names and values
- Re: p:exec - path separators
- RE: err:XS0010 and err:XS0031
- RE: p:exec - path separators
- RE: [closed] Re: 5.4 p:output. Informative para request
Friday, 10 April 2009
- Re: p:exec - path separators
- Re: err:XS0010 and err:XS0031
- Re: c:request/@send-authorization default
- [closed] Re: Error in the XProc Relax NG schema?
- [closed] Re: 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 variables, options, parameters
- Re: 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 variables, options, parameters
- Re: [closed] Re: Editorial. Section 2 note
- Re: [closed] Re: 5.4 p:output. Informative para request
- Re: 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 variables, options, parameters
- [closed] Re: Editorial. Section 2 note
- [closed] Re: 2.6 Clarification
- [closed] Re: 5.4 p:output. Informative para request
- RE: [closed] Re: Test err-c0016-001.xml and xs:boolean
- RE: xquery and c:data
Thursday, 9 April 2009
- Re: [closed] Re: Test err-c0016-001.xml and xs:boolean
- [closed] Re: p:exec - multiple source documents
- [closed] Re: p:xquery and c:data
- Re: p:exec - path separators
- Re: xquery and c:data
- Re: p:xquery and c:data
- [closed] Re: Section 5.11 unnecessary complex?
- [closed] Re: Inherited environment and input/output ports
- [closed] Re: p:xquery - empty context item
- Re: p:validate-with-xml-schema question
- RE: [closed] Re: Test err-c0016-001.xml and xs:boolean
- Re: [closed] Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources
- [closed] Re: http-request: if detail is true, XML not parsed?
Wednesday, 8 April 2009
- [closed] Re: Test err-c0016-001.xml and xs:boolean
- [closed] Re: p:http-request: c:response/c:body/@content-type value
- [closed] Re: p:http-request content-type and encoding
- [closed] Re: p:http-request: status message
- [closed] Re: p:http-request - duplication of information in c:multipart
- Re: HTTP redirects: MUST follow?
- RE: [closed] Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources
- Re: XQuery 1.0
- HTTP redirects: MUST follow?
- Re: http-request: if detail is true, XML not parsed?
- Re: [closed] Re: Required serialization methods support
Tuesday, 7 April 2009
- [closed] Re: p:hash and xml:base
- [closed] Re: Ordering of steps in a subpipeline
- [closed] Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources
- Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources
- Re: http-request: if detail is true, XML not parsed?
- [closed] Re: Required serialization methods support
- Re: XQuery 1.0
- [closed] Re: err:XC0016 and err:XD0019
- [closed] Re: New http-request test, http-request-012.xml
- [closed] Re: p:unescape-markup - "namespace" confusion
- [closed] Re: Select expression in input declaration
- [closed] Re: p:unescape-markup - changing the namespace URI
- [closed] Re: Replacing the document node in p:string-replace
- [closed] Re: p:xquery and XQueries that cannot be evaluated
- XQuery 1.0
- [closed] Re: Explain "&" in the syntax tableaux
- [closed] Re: Return code from p:exec?
- [closed] Re: Our algorithm for anonymous step names doesn't work
- [closed] Re: http-request authentication missing realm?
Thursday, 2 April 2009
- Relative URIs in p:log
- Re: p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
- Re: isnt p:group just p:declare-step
- RE: choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified
- Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare
- Re: isnt p:group just p:declare-step
- Re: p:group on p:try a bit verbose
- Re: errors and exceptions in xproc
- Re: reconsider non primary p:output on p:compare
- Re: isnt p:group just p:declare-step
- p:choose is poorly and/or incorrectly specified