public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org from September 2008 by date

Monday, 29 September 2008

Re: [closed] Re: sync p:option and p:with-option James Fuller
[closed] Re: sync p:option and p:with-option Norman Walsh
[closed] Re: clarify the difference of usage of p:input in section 5.1.1. Norman Walsh
[closed] Re: p:encrypt and p:decrypt Norman Walsh
Re: Another look at validate-with-xml-schema Henry S. Thompson

Sunday, 28 September 2008

Re: XProc comment Norman Walsh
Re: Another look at validate-with-xml-schema Norman Walsh
Another look at validate-with-xml-schema Vasil Rangelov

Friday, 26 September 2008

Re: Proposal for XProc: add output port to p:validate-with-xml-schema Henry S. Thompson
Proposal for XProc: add output port to p:validate-with-xml-schema James Garriss

Thursday, 25 September 2008

XProc Minutes 25 September 2008 Norman Walsh
Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect Florent Georges
Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect Norman Walsh
Re: LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron Norman Walsh
Re: LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron Norman Walsh

Wednesday, 24 September 2008

p:validate-with-schematron report defect Florent Georges
Re: LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron Jirka Kosek
Re: LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron Florent Georges
Re: LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron Dave Pawson
LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron Jirka Kosek

Tuesday, 23 September 2008

Re: sync p:option and p:with-option Norman Walsh
[closed] Re: simple rewording in 2.1 Steps Norman Walsh
[closed] Re: p:wrap and group-adjacent Norman Walsh

Monday, 22 September 2008

LCWD comments from XML Query and XSL WGs Andrew Eisenberg

Sunday, 21 September 2008

Re: p:wrap and group-adjacent mozer
p:wrap and group-adjacent Norman Walsh

Saturday, 20 September 2008

simple rewording in 2.1 Steps James Fuller

Friday, 19 September 2008

Re: sync p:option and p:with-option Norman Walsh
sync p:option and p:with-option James Fuller

Thursday, 18 September 2008

Re: clarify the difference of usage of p:input in section 5.1.1. Norman Walsh

Wednesday, 17 September 2008

Re: [closed] Re: rdf accommodation Paul Tyson
[closed] Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Norman Walsh
Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Dan Connolly
[closed] Re: determining an xproc extension attributes Norman Walsh
Re: [closed] Re: p:pipe convention James Fuller
Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Norman Walsh
Re: determining an xproc extension attributes James Fuller
Re: determining an xproc extension attributes Norman Walsh
Re: [closed] Re: foreign namespaces James Fuller
[closed] Re: p:pipe convention Norman Walsh
[closed] Re: foreign namespaces Norman Walsh
[closed] Re: what about option values on directly invoked p:declare-step Norman Walsh
Re: [closed] Re: more PSVI James Fuller
[closed] Re: more PSVI Norman Walsh
[closed] Re: rdf accommodation Norman Walsh

Monday, 15 September 2008

Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Jeni Tennison
Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Dan Connolly
Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Henry S. Thompson
Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Dan Connolly
Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Jeni Tennison
Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Henry S. Thompson

Friday, 12 September 2008

Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Dan Connolly
Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri mozer

Thursday, 11 September 2008

justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Dan Connolly
Re: determining an xproc extension attributes Henry S. Thompson

Tuesday, 2 September 2008

Re: determining an xproc extension attributes James Fuller
Re: determining an xproc extension attributes Norman Walsh

Monday, 1 September 2008

Re: determining an xproc extension attributes mozer
determining an xproc extension attributes James Fuller

Last message date: Monday, 29 September 2008 16:55:32 UTC