RE: exclude-inline-prefixes (err:XS0057, err:XS0058)

Also, for p:namespaces we have error err:XS0051 that says: "It is a
static error (err:XS0051) if the except-prefixes attribute on
p:namespaces does not contain a list of tokens or if any of those tokens
is not a prefix bound to a namespace in the in-scope namespaces of the
p:namespaces element." 

Why don't we say the same for @exclude-inline-prefixes as well (provided
we deal with the special '#default' value there)?

Vojtech


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-processing-model-comments-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-processing-model-comments-request@w3.org] 
> On Behalf Of Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 2:32 PM
> To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
> Subject: exclude-inline-prefixes (err:XS0057, err:XS0058)
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have a question about err:XS0057 (and err:XS0058 as well)
> 
> Section 5.12 says:
> 
> "It is a static error (err:XS0057) if a namespace prefix is 
> used within
> the exclude-inline-prefixes attribute and there is no 
> namespace binding
> in scope for that prefix."
> 
> And:
> 
> "It is a static error (err:XS0058) if the value #default is 
> used within
> the exclude-inline-prefixes attribute and there is no default 
> namespace
> in scope."
> 
> --
> 
> Is the processor supposed to check this everytime
> @exclude-inline-prefixes is specified (on p:library, p:declare-step,
> p:inline) or only when it actually *uses* the list of 
> excluded prefixes
> (that is, during parsing the contents of p:inline)?
> 
> I think the former is the expected behavior, but I am just not sure.
> 
> Regards,
> Vojtech
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2008 14:44:16 UTC