- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:30:44 +0000
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> Except we're talking about an *extension* step, right? So there's no
> interoperability virtue in making the declaration visible. The
> declaration won't help another implementation run it.
Not quite true -- it might enable a processor to reject the step on
calling-sequence grounds, by comparing its use with its declaration.
> So I propose that *both* pipelines are invalid. If I want to run a
> Calabash extension, I should have to explicitly declare or import the
> declaration in the pipeline:
Agreed.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFJJrgFkjnJixAXWBoRAnztAJsFCWrvpxf2PADgmosQ89a4EnG1iwCfWVbk
PGhphy2xYf4DYH7DWdnThF0=
=XjjA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 13:31:22 UTC