- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:39:14 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m28wrn5xvh.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: > Hi all, > > I was just wondering what is the most straightforward way to create an > element whose name is generated dynamically. The simplest solution I > managed to come up with is this: > > <p:rename> > <p:input port="source"> > <p:inline><foo/></p:inline> > </p:input> > <p:with-option name="new-value" select="..."/> > </p:rename> > > To me, this seems both elegant ("Nice, I can use p:rename for that") and > confusing at the same time ("Why do I have to use p:rename for > *creating* content!?")... > > What is your opinion on this? Is it OK, or should the spec provide some > functionality specifically for these types of use cases (by adding a new > step, or by extending the functionality of the existing steps, ...)? The WG considered this and decided not to make any changes for V1.0 Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The best people usually owe their http://nwalsh.com/ | excellence to a combination of | qualities which might have been | supposed incompatible.--Bertrand Russell
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 17:39:57 UTC