- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:39:14 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m28wrn5xvh.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I was just wondering what is the most straightforward way to create an
> element whose name is generated dynamically. The simplest solution I
> managed to come up with is this:
>
> <p:rename>
> <p:input port="source">
> <p:inline><foo/></p:inline>
> </p:input>
> <p:with-option name="new-value" select="..."/>
> </p:rename>
>
> To me, this seems both elegant ("Nice, I can use p:rename for that") and
> confusing at the same time ("Why do I have to use p:rename for
> *creating* content!?")...
>
> What is your opinion on this? Is it OK, or should the spec provide some
> functionality specifically for these types of use cases (by adding a new
> step, or by extending the functionality of the existing steps, ...)?
The WG considered this and decided not to make any changes for V1.0
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The best people usually owe their
http://nwalsh.com/ | excellence to a combination of
| qualities which might have been
| supposed incompatible.--Bertrand Russell
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 17:39:57 UTC