Re: err:XS0012 not needed?

Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:

> For p:input (5.1.1) we say that:
>
> "It is a static error (err:XS0012) if the port given does not match the
> name of an input port specified in the step's declaration."
>
> There is no corresponding error for p:output. Actually, there used to be
> one (err:XS0013) but it has been removed quite some time ago.
>
> My question is:
>
> - should we re-introduce err:XS0013; or
> - should we remove err:XS0012 because it actually is a subset of
> err:XS0010
>
> I think that the latter option is correct.

Yes. I think maybe you're right.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Never contend with a man who has
http://nwalsh.com/            | nothing to lose.-- Gracián

Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 14:27:32 UTC