- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:41:32 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2y6zs3foj.fsf_-_@nwalsh.com>
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: > >> My question is: When creating response c:body elements that contain >> base64 encoded content, should/must the processor always set the >> "encoding" attribute to "base64", or is this optional since the media >> type tells us enough as to what type of data c:body contains. > > I think it should, and I think I could support must. > >> I would say that if the response c:body is base64 encoded, the >> "encoding" attribute must always be set, otherwise the user of >> p:http-request has to write some extra logic (using the content-type of >> the c:body he gets) to detect whether to decode the data or not. > > Makes sense to me. > > Alex, you're are http-request expert :-) What do you think? I went ahead and made it a must. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Some people do their laundry in emacs, http://nwalsh.com/ | but I find typing ^C-^X-^W-q-L-TT to | add the fabric softener to be a bit | cumbersome.-- rlr@panix.com
Received on Sunday, 9 November 2008 18:42:13 UTC