- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 09:20:07 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2ve1wx2pk.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say: | in section 2 Pipeline Concepts it states; | | 'The result of evaluating a pipeline (or subpipeline) is the result of | evaluating the steps that it contains, in an order consistent with the | connections between them. A pipeline must behave as if it evaluated | each step each time it occurs. Unless otherwise indicated, | implementations must not assume that steps are functional (that is, | that their outputs depend only on their inputs, options, and | parameters) or side-effect free.' | | wondering if this is too limiting a paragraph with respect to possible | future optimizations ... for example, does the above term 'evaluated' | include simplifying a multi-container step to a container step, when | static analysis reveals that a certain logic branch (e.g. xpath | condition) is never satisfied. No, the magic phrase is "must behave as if". If static analysis reveals (correctly :-)) that only one branch of a choose *can ever happen* then discarding all the other branches and simplifying the step will *behave as if* each step was evaluated. At least, that's my understanding. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Our culture peculiarly honors the act http://nwalsh.com/ | of blaming, which it takes as the sign | of virtue and intellect.--Lionel | Trilling
Received on Friday, 2 May 2008 13:20:42 UTC