[closed] Re: xproc static and dynamic error output as xml

/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| I have change my mind on this ...

I'm going to close it then :-)

| mostly to do with implementation limitation;
|
| e.g. an informal survey of popular computing language error mechanisms
| shows that there is an incredible variability in error output format
| ... as well as limited control either as a constraint imposed by
| language designers or differences as imagined by language
| processor/compiler implementators.
|
| oddly formated plaintext error output has always interfered in making
| unit testing reports nicer ... also I would have thought that a
| standard standard error output XML vocabulary would be a no brainer in
| software development, anyone know of anything with any traction out
| there?
|
| cheers, Jim Fuller

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If today was a fish, I'd throw it back
http://nwalsh.com/            | in.