- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:17:07 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > The observation that XQuery documents don't have to be namespace well-formed > is a show-stopper for our current solution, I think. How so? In the latest draft, I see the content of <c:query> is a string, which should eliminate considerations of well-formedness. Could you elaborate on this? Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms, open-source, for the Enterprise Orbeon's Blog: http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ Personal Blog: http://avernet.blogspot.com/ Twitter - http://twitter.com/avernet
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2008 18:17:57 UTC