- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:50:45 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Monday, 15 December 2008 12:51:30 UTC
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: >> There seem to be three options: >> >> 1. Extend err:CX0005. >> 2. Create a new error. >> 3. Say that a missing c:body is the same as <c:body></c:body> >> >> I don't feel strongly about which, but we should pick one of those. > > I am still not 100% sure on this one, but I think you can do POST with > no body. So my original comment can proabably be ignored. I'm sure you can do a post with no body (or with a zero-length body, anyway). I offered 3 as that option. And on further reflection, I think that's probably the right answer. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | All generalizations are dangerous, even http://nwalsh.com/ | this one.--Alexandre Dumas
Received on Monday, 15 December 2008 12:51:30 UTC