Re: sub-pipeline

2008/12/10 Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>:
> The term is used twice in the CR, first in 2.5
>
> Nowhere is there a definition.

I stand corrected.

http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/#dt-subpipeline

The definition is for subpipeline.

The remainder of the document uses sub-pipeline.

Suggest an editorial correction.


regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 18:21:28 UTC