- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 05:03:24 -0500
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
> >> Does anyone else think it's odd that we don't provide the > exit value > >> given by the exec'd process? > >> > > > > Good point. I think we could add "exit-value" port to p:exec with no > > harm. > > It can only ever be an integer, so can't we just say that it's an > attribute on the c:result that exec produces? Fine by me, as long as it does not matter that we will have to change the schema for c:result (and that "exit-value" will not make any sense for the other steps that produce c:result). > > More challenging: should p:exec have a parameter input port and should > it use those parameters to set environment variables? > Hmm, why not? Regards, Vojtech
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2008 10:04:39 UTC