- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:45:50 +0100
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Kay writes: > 7. Technical. In 2.5, Parameters, it seems unnecessarily constraining to > require that the value of a parameter be a string. In XSLT, for example, it > is common for a parameter to have a document as its value. The Working Group discussed your comment both by email [1] and on a call [2]. Although your request got some support, the WG did not reach consensus on a proposal to add such functionality to the spec. The fact that XSLT itself does not require implementations to support external binding of documents to parameters was probably the most telling objection. The WG did agree that the general question of managing multiple input documents whose cardinality was not known in advance was one we would return to for Vnext, and that any solution to that problem would almost certainly address the requirement which your request was intended to satisfy. ht [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-comments/2007Oct/0005.html [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2007/10/04-minutes.html#item05 - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHD1BfkjnJixAXWBoRAv5YAJ9r9OcC6daPjlWBUEm/dn/sQW6o8wCfW6TT NIhGWadr9XJ8kvCGJvQ/roI= =/SPn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 10:46:07 UTC