- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:05:17 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 14:05:32 UTC
I really think it's a mistake to require the URI for http-request to
be an http: or https: URI. There are lots of (unfortunately non-standard)
URI schemes out there that are really just http with a different scheme
name, e.g., ical:
I don't see any reason why an implementation should be forbidden from
understanding other schemes.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/ | possible, but no simpler.
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 14:05:32 UTC