- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:05:17 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 14:05:32 UTC
I really think it's a mistake to require the URI for http-request to be an http: or https: URI. There are lots of (unfortunately non-standard) URI schemes out there that are really just http with a different scheme name, e.g., ical: I don't see any reason why an implementation should be forbidden from understanding other schemes. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as http://nwalsh.com/ | possible, but no simpler.
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 14:05:32 UTC