- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:18:00 +0200
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
taking the definition of a sub pipeline http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#dt-subpipeline and the definition of viewport how can the spec example be correct 4.3.2 Example or rephrased; Is a viewport naturally a subpipeline? or Is it envisaged that the subpipeline, within a viewport, should encapsulated.... e.g. should there be a (p:for-each|p:viewport|p:choose|p:group|p:try|pfx:other-step|p:documentation|ipfx:ignored)* element? taking the 4.3.2 example <p:viewport match="h:div[@class='chapter']" xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p:group> <p:insert at-start="true"> <p:input port="insertion"> <p:inline> <hr xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/> </p:inline> </p:input> </p:insert> </p:group> </p:viewport> is there any default encapsulation if this wrapping element is omitted? another related question with viewport and I guess generally about subpipelines is if there is a need to provide some more 'words' on error handling ? cheers, JIm Fuller
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 10:18:08 UTC