- From: Vasil Rangelov <boen.robot@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 00:36:10 +0300
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
===========Henry S. Thompson=========== So there are two things missing from this that we have in the comparable Markup pipeline: 1) A 'cwd' option, which gives the working directory in which to run the subprocess; ======================================= Which would default to the options' base URI? ===========Henry S. Thompson=========== 2) The ability to take a sequence as input -- the contents are serialised onto stdin in order. I think (1) is important, I can live w/o (2). ======================================= Same here ===========Henry S. Thompson=========== I think we should _either_ make the thing symmetric (i.e. assume the input is already in escaped-document form) _or_ include the serialization options. . . ======================================= What I still can't figure out is why assume the input is XML at all, when most programs out there today won't accept it? Why not make input an option, or a union of all parameters passed on a special input kind="parameter" port, or... anything that would eventually lead to a string, rather than a tree. Regards, Vasil Rangelov
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 21:35:37 UTC