- From: Vasil Rangelov <boen.robot@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 00:36:10 +0300
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
===========Henry S. Thompson===========
So there are two things missing from this that we have in the
comparable Markup pipeline:
1) A 'cwd' option, which gives the working directory in which to run
the subprocess;
=======================================
Which would default to the options' base URI?
===========Henry S. Thompson===========
2) The ability to take a sequence as input -- the contents are
serialised onto stdin in order.
I think (1) is important, I can live w/o (2).
=======================================
Same here
===========Henry S. Thompson===========
I think we should _either_ make the thing symmetric (i.e. assume the
input is already in escaped-document form) _or_ include the
serialization options. . .
=======================================
What I still can't figure out is why assume the input is XML at all, when
most programs out there today won't accept it? Why not make input an option,
or a union of all parameters passed on a special input kind="parameter"
port, or... anything that would eventually lead to a string, rather than a
tree.
Regards,
Vasil Rangelov
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 21:35:37 UTC