public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org from October 2007 by date

Tuesday, 30 October 2007

• Should defaulted ports be named? Richard Tobin

Monday, 29 October 2007

• Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document Nikolay Fiykov

Friday, 26 October 2007

• Supporting XSLT 2.0 (Was: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document) Jeni Tennison
• Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document Jeni Tennison
• Steps you can do in XSLT (Was:Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document) Jeni Tennison
• XPath version (Was: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document) Jeni Tennison
• Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document Nikolay Fiykov

Thursday, 25 October 2007

• Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document Sharon Adler
• Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document Jeni Tennison
• Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document Sharon Adler
• Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? Richard Tobin
• Re: put optional step in different namespace James Fuller

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

• RE: put optional step in different namespace Vasil Rangelov
• RE: clarification of p:pipeline-library and p:import Vasil Rangelov
• clarification of p:pipeline-library and p:import James Fuller
• proposed changes and clarifications to p:load James Fuller
• propose changing p:directory-list filter option James Fuller
• put optional step in different namespace James Fuller

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

• Last Call Comment on XProc - http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070920/ Jo Rabin

Sunday, 21 October 2007

• Standard (ECMAScript) interface for invoking XProc Vasil Rangelov

Friday, 19 October 2007

• Re: Scope of options Norman Walsh

Thursday, 18 October 2007

• Embedding one pipeline into another (or "defaulting pipeline libraries") Vasil Rangelov
• Re: Scope of options Jeni Tennison
• [closed] Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc James Fuller
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc Norman Walsh
• Scope of options Norman Walsh
• Form urlencode/decode for p:http-request? Norman Walsh
• Proposed new step: p:uuid Norman Walsh
• Proposed new step: p:hash Norman Walsh

Wednesday, 17 October 2007

• i meant, there is not document input re 3.4 Associating Documents with Ports James Fuller

Tuesday, 16 October 2007

• RE: comments on XProc last-call draft Vasil Rangelov
• typo in 3.4 Associating Documents with Ports James Fuller
• comments on XProc last-call draft Nikolay Fiykov
• Re: p:http-request dynamic error if not c:http-request? mozer

Monday, 15 October 2007

• headers in p:http-request Norman Walsh

Sunday, 14 October 2007

• RE: http-request dynamic error if not c:http-request? Vasil Rangelov
• p:http-request dynamic error if not c:http-request? Norman Walsh
• Re: XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: is p:inline underspecified? Norman Walsh

Saturday, 13 October 2007

• XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 Michael Kay

Friday, 12 October 2007

• RE: is p:inline underspecified? James Fuller
• [Vasil Rangelov] RE: is p:inline underspecified? Henry S. Thompson
• RE: is p:inline underspecified? Vasil Rangelov
• RE: Comment 30, Parameter inputs as strings (was Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2) Michael Kay
• Re: is p:inline underspecified? Norman Walsh
• Comment 30, Parameter inputs as strings (was Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2) Henry S. Thompson
• a note on spec link usability James Fuller
• is p:inline underspecified? James Fuller
• xsl-formatter Norman Walsh

Thursday, 11 October 2007

• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc Norman Walsh
• RE: injecting options and parameters into XProc Vasil Rangelov

Wednesday, 10 October 2007

• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc James Fuller
• Re: Parameter order Norman Walsh
• Re: Parameter order Norman Walsh
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc Norman Walsh
• RE: Parameter order Vasil Rangelov
• RE: injecting options and parameters into XProc Vasil Rangelov
• Re: Parameter order Jeni Tennison
• Re: Parameter order Norman Walsh
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc Norman Walsh
• RE: Parameter order Vasil Rangelov
• RE: http and https in p:http-request Vasil Rangelov
• [closed] Re: error in example 4.3.2 with dangling p:pipeline element Norman Walsh
• Re: what does p:episode actually mean ? Norman Walsh
• Re: 2.8.3 XProc Extension Functions Norman Walsh
• Re: dynamic error err:XD0011 and p:document Norman Walsh
• Re: xinclude processing and XProc Norman Walsh
• Re: clarify 5.11 p:pipe definition and refering to p:pipeline inputs Norman Walsh
• Re: Dynamic errors, choose Norman Walsh
• Re: Dynamic errors, choose Norman Walsh
• Re: http and https in p:http-request Norman Walsh
• Re: viewport Norman Walsh
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc Norman Walsh
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc Norman Walsh

Tuesday, 9 October 2007

• RE: re injecting options and another question Vasil Rangelov
• re injecting options and another question James Fuller

Monday, 8 October 2007

• RE: injecting options and parameters into XProc Vasil Rangelov
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc James Fuller
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc Jeni Tennison
• clarify 5.11 p:pipe definition and refering to p:pipeline inputs James Fuller
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc James Fuller
• p:xinclude Norman Walsh
• Re: Dynamic errors, choose Richard Tobin
• Re: Dynamic errors, choose Jeni Tennison
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc Jeni Tennison
• RE: http and https in p:http-request Vasil Rangelov
• http and https in p:http-request Norman Walsh
• Dynamic errors, choose Richard Tobin
• Re: Primary parameter input port? Norman Walsh
• error in example 4.3.2 with dangling p:pipeline element James Fuller
• viewport James Fuller
• Re: Primary parameter input port? mozer
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc James Fuller
• Primary parameter input port? Norman Walsh

Sunday, 7 October 2007

• Re: Parameter order Norman Walsh
• Re: xinclude processing and XProc mozer
• Re: xinclude processing and XProc James Fuller
• Re: xinclude processing and XProc mozer
• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc mozer
• Parameter order Norman Walsh

Saturday, 6 October 2007

• Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc Norman Walsh
• injecting options and parameters into XProc James Fuller
• what does p:episode actually mean ? James Fuller
• 2.8.3 XProc Extension Functions James Fuller
• dynamic error err:XD0011 and p:document James Fuller
• xinclude processing and XProc James Fuller
• 3.2 Scoping of Names James Fuller

Friday, 5 October 2007

• Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? Norman Walsh
• Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? Vasil Rangelov
• Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? Norman Walsh

Thursday, 4 October 2007

• Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? Vasil Rangelov
• Re: p:add-xml-base with relative=true Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Saxonica Comment 7 on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 Norman Walsh
• Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Saxonica Comment 7 on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Multiple imports Richard Tobin
• Minor error in defn of readable ports Richard Tobin

Wednesday, 3 October 2007

• Re: Multiple imports Norman Walsh
• Re: Multiple imports Richard Tobin

Tuesday, 2 October 2007

• Re: Multiple imports Dave Pawson
• Multiple imports Norman Walsh

Monday, 1 October 2007

• Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? Vasil Rangelov
• Re: Saxonica Comment 7 on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 Norman Walsh
• Saxonica Comment 7 on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 Norman Walsh
• Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 Norman Walsh
• Rewording about infosets Norman Walsh
• Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? Norman Walsh
• Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? Vasil Rangelov

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 October 2007 12:03:54 UTC