- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:45:17 +0000
- To: "Vasil Rangelov" <boen.robot@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I think the idea of using file: IRIs for the 'cwd' option has a lot to
recommend it, but I'm not sure the same can be said for the 'command'
option. Most (all?) modern operating systems support a notion of
search path for executables, but using URIs/IRIs for the 'command'
option would _either_ mean that the search path could never be
appealed to, _or_ would require some special syntax to avoid
resolution against the operative base URI. . .
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHTC19kjnJixAXWBoRAhQiAJ40MSGMke9F6JWXV/sfWpRD0qUiwACfV926
wLt5MvOFh0J8mPgI54NtGIQ=
=iQi2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2007 14:45:39 UTC