- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:12:07 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 17:12:25 UTC
/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say: | I really think it's a mistake to require the URI for http-request to | be an http: or https: URI. There are lots of (unfortunately non-standard) | URI schemes out there that are really just http with a different scheme | name, e.g., ical: | | I don't see any reason why an implementation should be forbidden from | understanding other schemes. This issue was resolved to my satisfaction at the f2f. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as http://nwalsh.com/ | possible, but no simpler.
Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 17:12:25 UTC