Re: viewport

Jim,

/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
[...]
| |     Is a viewport naturally a subpipeline?
|
| I'm not sure what you mean. A p:viewport is a compound step. The p:viewport
| in Example 4.3.2 contains a subpipeline that consists of a single p:insert
| step. Where is the conflict?
|
| |     Is it envisaged that the subpipeline, within a viewport, should
| | encapsulated.... e.g. should there be a
| |
| | (p:for-each|p:viewport|p:choose|p:group|p:try|pfx:other-step|p:documentation|ipfx:ignored)*
| |
| | element? taking the 4.3.2 example
|
| A p:insert is a pfx:other-step :-)

Are you satisfied by this answer?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.