[closed] Re: Parameter order

/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
| / Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
| | Section 5.1.2 says, in part:
| |
| |   If the step also has literal p:parameter elements, they are are also
| |   considered in document order. In other words, p:parameter elements
| |   that appear before the parameter input may be overridden by the
| |   computed parameters; p:parameter elements that appear after may
| |   override the computed values.
| |
| | Is this really necessary? No where else do we consider the order of
| | elements in the signature significant.
| |
| | Could we just live with literal p:parameter elements always override
| | any provided on a port?
|
| I suppose it's not that big a deal. Maybe its worth it.

I'm satisfied with the status quo.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.

Received on Friday, 9 November 2007 14:49:57 UTC