- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:17:58 +0200
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
as a thought experiment, I think its valid to say that p:viewport
could be decomposed into two separate steps;
p:xpath
and
p:xupdate
was there any discussion about xupdate as an update type mechanism ?
I use xupdate quite a bit in eXist and have found it to be ok for most
of the tasks required....or at worts I have to revert to using
something like proprietary XQuery update extensions. I ask because I
am curious about the arguements or discussion around xupdate.
as an aside, I do see the name being a bit awkward...I would propose renaming
p:viewport
to
p:view-port
seems a bit clearer
cheers, Jim Fuller
Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 22:18:03 UTC