- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:04:42 +0200
- To: "Lloyd Harding" <lloydhardingjr@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On 8/12/07, Lloyd Harding <lloydhardingjr@gmail.com> wrote: > SPC > XProc did a good job of providing the 'attachment' and the 'association' > principles for the creation of assembly lines mentioned in 1993. > > Xproc error capabilities identify if the step does not conform to the XProc > specification and provides a mechanism for the step internals to report > using its own built-in error capabilities. Basic programming viewpoint. > > However, XProc does not include the use of Statistical Process Control (SPC) > to maintain and improve quality of product produced by the step internals. > This capability is essential for ....lines to maintain quality and should be > part of the line not dependent on the developers of steps to include. Interesting paralel with industrie ! But you should also be aware that Schemas *are* the way to make Continued Process Control (and not only statistical) And three and a half of the available schema languages available for doing this *are* in XProc : * XML Schema * Relax NG * Schematron * DTD (that's the half which is hidden in p:load) So I think that we don't need SPC when we already have CPC Regards, Xmlizer
Received on Monday, 13 August 2007 16:04:59 UTC