- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 16:54:47 +0200
- To: "Vasil Rangelov" <boen.robot@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
I do not agree There is sensible differences between each * p:iteration-source allows sequence and optionnaly a @select * p:viewport-source allow one and only one single document and no @select * p:xpath-contect allow zero or one document and no @select It seems that those elements are sufficiently different to not be merged Xmlizer On 8/4/07, Vasil Rangelov <boen.robot@gmail.com> wrote: > > For simplification to pipeline authors, I think the p:iteration-source and > p:viewport-source should be removed in favor of p:xpath-context. > > There seems to be no reason for not doing so. They all share the same > function (to create a binding for a compound step), the same content (a > single binding, pointed either with p:document, p:pipe, p:inline or p:empty) > and everything. > > The specification does describe the semantics of p:iteration-source a bit > differently though, so I guess that the it will either have to provide a > generic definition (which practically means removal of the "select" > attribute) or describe the semantics of p:xpath-context in that special > case. > > Regards, > Vasil Rangelov > > > >
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 14:54:53 UTC