- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:37:16 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On 4/13/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > / James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | I am interested in the thinking behind XProc defined micro operations > | e.g. especially as it pertains to overlap with the use of well > | established (though not necc widely adopted) standards like Xupdate > | and XQuery update extensions. > | > | My preference would be to simplify things and not have micro > | operations if at all possible. > > Unlike Xupdate and XQuery update facilities, the micro operations > don't update anything, they are really simple, streaming > transformations. > > Does that help clarify things? yes it does, just trying to map the meme.... so this is akin to a filter? I can see the benefit of applying pre and post filters to xml documents wherever they are defined and generated. will think a bit more about this before responding in full. cheers, Jim Fuller
Received on Saturday, 14 April 2007 07:37:21 UTC