W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-id@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Typo in xml-id spec; canonicalization?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:46:37 +0100
To: Webb Roberts <webb.roberts@gtri.gatech.edu>
Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org, Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Message-ID: <f5bd5rnqvz6.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Webb Roberts writes:

> Elliotte Harold wrote:
>> Is there some reason you can't mandate exclusive XML canonicalization?
> It appears that deployed web services applications have too great a
> dependence on XML Canonicalization to mandate exclusive
> canonicalization.  So, it appears that we won't be able to deploy
> xml:id, unless something changes.

Please expand -- what sources did this information come from?  It
doesn't fit with what we've heard informally.

We agree that this is an important issue, and the more concrete
information we can find the more likely we are to make good progress.

 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2005 11:46:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:50 UTC