W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-id@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Typo in xml-id spec; canonicalization?

From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 08:12:18 -0400
Message-ID: <4278BC22.7030209@metalab.unc.edu>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: Webb Roberts <webb.roberts@gtri.gatech.edu>, public-xml-id@w3.org

Chris Lilley wrote:

> The type of canonicalization that is used in signatures does not have
> the problem that gave a conflict with all non-inherited xml:*
> attributes. So i doubt there would be any resistance, myself.

Actually, *a* type of canonicalization used in signatures does not have 
the problem. Specifically exclusive XML caonicalization does not have 
this problem. However regular inclusive XML canonicalization is also 
used in signatures and it does have this problem.

Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2005 12:12:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:50 UTC