- From: Webb Roberts <webb.roberts@gtri.gatech.edu>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:24:58 -0400
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Webb Roberts <webb.roberts@gtri.gatech.edu> was heard to say: > | "XML Schema authors are encouraged to use xml:id attributes > | exclusively in to indicate element identifiers." My issue was not with the semantics of the sentence, rather that there seemed to be words missing: "XML Schema authors are encouraged to use xml:id attributes exclusively in [SOMETHING GOES HERE] to indicate element identifiers." > To the extent that your specifications make use of exclusive (rather > than inclusive) C14N, I believe that the C14N issues do not apply. > > Hopefully it will be possible to revise the C14N spec so that this > problem goes away (though, of course, nothing can be done to fix > existing deployed software). I think it would be very helpful if there was some structured documentation that would help us get xml:id through c14n objections. Right now, there is resistance. Thanks, Webb
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 01:19:24 UTC