Ann,
The XML Core WG has considered the issue you raised[1] at length.
While opinion on this issue may remain divided, we believe that the
consensus rests with the status quo. At least, within the XML Core WG,
that is the consensus position. In brief:
1. The use of "xml:id" is consistent with xml:lang and xml:space.
2. The xml: prefix cannot be bound to other URIs, nor can other prefixes
be bound to the XML namespace name so the complxity that would arise
from those circumstances does not occur in practice.
3. While there are some issues with canonicalization, we perceive
these to be problems with the C14N specification.
We hope that the discussion that followed your comment has been
valuable and that you are satisified with our resolution of these
issues. If you are not, please let us know.
Be seeing you,
norm
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-id/2005Apr/0013
--
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Friday, 10 June 2005 17:32:13 UTC