- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:41:39 +0100
- To: public-xml-id@w3.org
Le mardi 08 février 2005 à 10:27 -0500, Norman Walsh a écrit :
>
> I can see the arguments in favor of xmlid, but I still prefer xml:id.
A benefit of using xml:id is that after having updated the schema that
defines the XML namespace to specify that xml:id has a type xs:ID, any
application that relies on this schema would support xml:id without
requiring any update.
I don't know how many software do behave that way, but this seems like a
worthy benefit!
Eric
--
Freelance consulting and training.
http://dyomedea.com/english/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 15:42:11 UTC